Mark Etinger asked:




As the economy has steadily declined and jobs continue to be lost, more and more Americans find themselves in need of serious loan modification help. A large number of families are struggling to stay up-to-date on their mortgage payments, and as many as six million families are likely to face foreclosure in the next few years. Even the fortunate families who are able to shell out monthly payments on time have become victims of this economic crisis due to decreasing property values.

However, there are a number of options for homeowners who are struggling financially. The most common is employing the help of one of the highly successful loan modification companies who specialize in assisting homeowners in permanently changing the terms of their loan. This will result in lower monthly payments, reduced interest rates, and often a waiving of delinquent payments, making the mortgage more affordable for the payer. It is a highly recommended option that can often result in interest rates being unfathomably reduced and eventually caped.

There are also a series of government-issued plans that are intended to keep/put money in the pockets of the American homeowner.

One of those plans is the Homeowners Affordability and Stability Plan. Announced on February 19th of 2009, the Homeowners Affordability and Stability Plan is a $65 billion program intended to help approximately nine million U.S. homeowners who are making a good-faith effort to stay current on payments avid foreclosure. The plan was later supplemented by $200 billion in additional funding for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to more easily provide loan modification help.

The program will provide an opportunity for nearly five million responsible homeowners to refinance over time. Additionally, the Treasury Department will use a five-part strategy intended to prevent millions of foreclosures, and continue to buy a series of mortgage-backed securities to promote and support low mortgage rates.

Another government-issued plan recently enacted is HOME STAR, or more popularly known as Cash for Caulkers. The plan is intended to encourage economic growth by encouraging homeowners to make energy-efficient improvements to their homes by offering rebates.

While the Cash for Caulkers plan would likely reduce air pollution and greenhouse gases, it is undeniably mostly intended to stimulate American business by increasing spending on materials and installation. It is also hoped that making environmentally-friendly additions to a home would also significantly reduce power bills over the long haul.

However, the Cash for Caulkers plan does not seem ideal for a family already struggling to make payments on their mortgage. After all, if you are already struggling with your month-to-month bill payments and are badly in need of home load modification, spending more money to renovate the energy efficiency of your home seems counterproductive, regardless of what rebates are being offered.

While the government is taking steps to help stimulate the economy, as well as prevent Americans from losing their homes, it would appear that one of the best options is seeking professional home loan modification help, therefore decreasing monthly payments while simultaneously keeping your roof over your head.

Gordon

Andre Savoie asked:




Mortgage Takeover of Fannie/Freddie: Good For Borrowers?

Government officials dropped a bombshell last week when they announced the seizure of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Wall Street rallied, interest rates dropped and the politicians and pundits are claiming this will mark the end of the suffering brought on by the mortgage mess.

This is good news, right?

In the short term yes but everyone should stop and consider what the long term implications are of the government running the mortgage industry.

What’s Really Going On?

In a nutshell – Uncle Sam just co-signed for all of our loans.

Officials announced the move would involve placing these mortgage operations into a “government conservatorship” in hopes of stabilizing the housing / credit markets. In a conservatorship, like bankruptcy, common stockholders are expected to lose their investments.

Essentially this is the equivalent of a giant “bail out.” Investors have been scared to death of a worsening “meltdown” and this move basically puts the governments money (your and my money) behind the mortgage industry to make sure it doesn’t fall down.

With the housing and credit markets continuing to slump and with fears of the “meltdown” getting worse this move was the governments best bet to shore up markets.

Impact For Borrowers:

Good News:

1. Lower interest rates in the short haul. Who doesn’t like lower rates?
2. Investors get a shot of confidence. Now that Uncle Sam is the co-signer investors feel more confident that the mortgage backed debts will remain solvent.
3. The government owns your loan. How bad can that be?

Bad News:

1. The government owns our loan – uh, oh. Ever tried negotiating with the IRS? While the government has had FHA, VA and other programs it does not have experience managing the type of operations that Fannie and Freddie run.
2. Future uncertainty about management / guidelines. Our inside sources are telling us that the future of guidelines……
3. Long term implications…..

What Should Borrowers Do?

Borrowers should be looking to capitalize on the temporary drop in rates and stabilization of credit markets. In the week since the announcements rates have steadily declines as investors are feeling the relief of the government bailout.

Our suggestions:

1. Make sure your mortgage in process can drop down to the new rates
2. Make sure your loan officer is fully educated about the changes and how it might impact your loan.
3. Check your Good Faith Estimate (GFE) and Truth in Lending (TIL) to make sure your mortgage company is not “up selling” your loan to take advantage of the lower rates to make a higher commission.

What Does the Future Hold?

We believe that the housing market recovery will probably determine when the credit markets regain their health. Why? Because decreasing home values resulted in the inability of homeowners to sell or refinance their house to get out of financial trouble – which is how this mortgage issue all got started.

Here are some recent facts:

Maybe the housing marketing isn’t so bad in many areas. The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight’s (OFHEO) House Price Index (HPI) reported in May that 35 states saw a positive home value price change in the first quarter of 2008. In addition, 164 MSAs showed positive first quarter appreciation when compared to the same quarter of 2007.

California, Florida, Nevada, and Arizona are still the largest statistical problem areas for home prices. Industry experts acknowledge that these markets were the most speculative during the 2000 – 2005 mortgage mayhem. And because the values in these areas are very high relative to the rest of the country it has a larger impact on the overall numbers.

Just because four states are still falling, and 11 other states continue to try and stabilize doesn’t mean the entire market will continue to take the plunge. According to PMI Mortgage Insurance Company’s “Economic & Real Estate Trends” recent report, almost 68% of the nation’s 322 remaining MSAs experienced positive appreciation everywhere other than California, Florida, Nevada, and Arizona.

So while no one has a crystal ball it appears things are not quite as bad as the media would have us believe. If the credit markets can begin to stabilize and home prices hold steady we may yet see the end of this “mortgage crisis.”

Joe

Katharine Norman asked:




Mortgage refinancing can make good sense if you want to make improvements on the house, pay those college fees, or pay-down higher-interest loans. As property prices have gone up and up, homeowners often find they have more equity than they ever dreamed of when they first bought. Richard Syron, CEO and Chairman of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation — or ‘Freddie Mac’ — says “more than a dozen years of sustained growth in housing prices have turned many middle class homeowners into millionaires; put countless children through college; and made the family home the most valuable egg in the American nest”. Maybe we can’t all be millionaires but, even so, “for the typical family, home equity accounts for the bulk of their wealth,” agrees Frank Nothaft, chief economist at Freddie Mac.

It all looks good, so far. But now that you’ve started to look for that home equity loan — most likely a fixed-term second mortgage, or a line of credit — maybe you’re starting to wonder why home equity rates are generally higher than all those great first mortgage packages?
There are quite a few reasons. For a start, you’re comparing apples and oranges –they’re different breeds of loan, and the interest rates reflect the different features offered by each. But how, exactly, are those interest rates set? Frank Nothaft explains that “home equity loans are typically linked to the prime rate … many home equity loans have rates that are 1 percent or more above the prime rate” and, by comparison, “most 30-year first mortgages are typically below prime”. The interest rate for a typical home equity loan needs to take several factors into account: the risks to the lender, the duration of the loan, the flexibility offered to the borrower, and the amount of the loan in relation to the amount of equity available (referred to as the Loan to Value (LTV).

The first mortgage, of whatever kind, is just that — it’s the first lien on your property, and the first in line if you default on your loans. When you got your first mortgage you put your home up as collateral against the loan. If you can’t make the payments, the mortgage company can proceed with a collection action — in a worst-case scenario, you lose the house to pay off the loan. And, because it’s the primary loan, your first mortgage has priority in any collection action. Essentially, the mortgage company is confident that they’ll get their money back if you default. For a second mortgage, the situation’s different: whether it’s a conventional repayment mortgage or a line of credit (or any other kind of loan), it’s second in line if things go wrong. So that’s a bit more of a risk to the mortgage company, particularly if the value of your house depreciates, or you take out yet more loans.

And then there’s the time factor. The term, or duration, of a home equity loan is usually far less than that of a first mortgage. Most first mortgages are for a period of maybe 15, 20, or even 30 years. That’s because most people want to minimize their mortgage payments as much as possible, especially at the outset, and they’re in it for the long-haul. And, just think about it: while you’re making the payments, you’re paying interest, and you’re making the mortgage company money. You’re a good bet. That’s why, when it comes to first mortgages, companies compete with each other so aggressively to get your custom. And they pass that competition on to you, through lower interest rates.

A standard home equity loan is effectively a second mortgage, and can be a fixed or adjustable rate mortgage. The money is loaned in one lump sum, and payments are made over a pre-arranged duration — just like a first mortgage. But a home equity loan is typically for a short term, possibly only for a few years. Usually it’s for a specific purpose — home improvements, or paying of a debt — and the higher interest rate means most people prefer to pay it off as soon as they can, rather than mount up large amounts of interest. The mortgage company doesn’t have your custom for the long-haul, and it takes this into account when setting the interest rate.

Even so, this kind of mortgage can be far cheaper than the interest rates on credit cards or unsecured loans. As interest rates rise, pushed up by the Federal Reserve’s successive increases in the prime or ‘index’ rate, more and more borrowers are seeing the value of fixed-rate home equity options, in the 10-15 year range. Although these still have higher interest rates than first mortgages, homeowners have the best of both worlds: the comfort of knowing the rate won’t rise, and the ability to improve their quality of life by releasing the equity in their home.

With the other kind of home equity loan, the line of credit, you can draw cash whenever you want, up to your limit. When you pay money back, that credit is released again for you to use, immediately. In that sense it’s an “open account”, a bit like having a credit card, but with lower interest rates. This freedom to dip in and out of the loan can be a boon for the homeowner, who only pays interest on the amount owed, and nothing more — but it is more unpredictable, and less lucrative, for the mortgage company. So you pay that bit more for the flexibility of being able to use the loan as you wish, and that comes in the form of a higher interest rate.

But, given the ability to release your equity and use your wealth when and where you want, it can certainly pay to refinance. Don Taylor, of Bankrate.com, agrees, saying that a home equity loan, or a home equity line of credit (HELOC) can “allow you to restructure your debts or finance something that’s important to you,” and adds that both kinds of loan typically have much lower closing costs than a first mortgage.

Maurice